IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.70.2.128_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-rabies treatments in New Mexico: Impact of a comprehensive consultation-biologics system

Author

Listed:
  • Mann, J.M.
  • Burkhart, M.J.
  • Rollag, O.J.

Abstract

Fewer than 20% of the 30,000 antirabies treatments administered in the United States each year are necessary. New Mexico established a comprehensive consultation-biologics program to assist physicians in making appropriate and systematic rabies treatment decisions. In 1978, 32 individuals received anti-rabies treatments as the result of 144 physician consultation requests. Dog and cat exposures accounted for 70 per cent of consultations and 63 per cent of the treatments. A seasonal peak of both consultations and treatments was observed in the summer and early autumn. The cost of biologics was $212 per treatment. Coordinated use of laboratory diagnostic services and animal control resources obviated the need for treatment in over 60 per cent of the 112 consultations not resulting in treatment. Experience in 1978 suggested that the system was probably responsible for a greater than five-fold reduction in the annual rate of anti-rabies treatments in New Mexico. Efficient physician utilization and high acceptability of the program may be attributed to maximization of private sector input into design and implementation of this public health program.

Suggested Citation

  • Mann, J.M. & Burkhart, M.J. & Rollag, O.J., 1980. "Anti-rabies treatments in New Mexico: Impact of a comprehensive consultation-biologics system," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 70(2), pages 128-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.70.2.128_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.70.2.128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.70.2.128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.70.2.128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.70.2.128_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.