IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303986_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing years of life lost versus number of deaths in the United States, 1995-2015

Author

Listed:
  • Taksler, G.B.
  • Rothberg, M.B.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess years of life lost to each cause of death in the United States between 1995 and 2015, and compare it with the number of deaths. Methods. We used Vital Statistics mortality data and defined "life-years lost" as remaining life expectancy for each decedent's age, sex, and race.Wecalculated the share of life-years lost to each cause of death in each year, and examined reasons for changes. Results. In 2015, heart disease caused the most deaths, but cancer caused 23% more life-years lost. Life-years lost to heart disease declined 6% since 1995, whereas life-years lost to cancer increased 16%. The increase for cancer was entirely attributable to population growth and longer life expectancy; had these factors remained constant, life-years lost to heart disease and cancer would have fallen 56% and 38%, respectively. Accidents (including overdoses), suicides, and homicides each caused twice the share of life-years lost as deaths. Measuring life-years lost highlighted racial disparities in heart disease, homicides, and perinatal conditions. Conclusions. Life-years lost may provide additional context for understanding long-term mortality trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Taksler, G.B. & Rothberg, M.B., 2017. "Assessing years of life lost versus number of deaths in the United States, 1995-2015," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(10), pages 1653-1659.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303986_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303986
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303986_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.