IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303936_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicaid reimbursement for the female condom

Author

Listed:
  • Witte, S.S.
  • MacPhee, C.
  • Ginsburg, N.
  • Deshmukh, N.

Abstract

Objectives.To examine state-level female condom use through Medicaid from 2004 to 2014, because in 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) allowed for expanded Medicaid coverage in many states, extending requirements for contraceptive care to more of the poorest women in the United States and to most women with private insurance. Methods.Wecollected data via brief survey of Medicaid offices in all 50 states between March 2015 and March 2016. Results. The number of states providing Medicaid reimbursement for the female condom increased 33% (from 25 to 36) since 2007. Twenty-nine states provided data showing low numbers of claims for female condoms but high rates of reimbursement. Conclusions. This period of heightened access demands that the public health community seize the moment to increase awareness about and promote the female condom among health care professionals and consumers. The pending repeal of the ACA may thwart important gains in access; policies promoting women's reproductive health must be implemented immediately.

Suggested Citation

  • Witte, S.S. & MacPhee, C. & Ginsburg, N. & Deshmukh, N., 2017. "Medicaid reimbursement for the female condom," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(10), pages 1633-1635.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303936_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303936_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.