IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303935_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tobacco industry research on nicotine replacement therapy: "if anyone is going to take away our business it should be us"

Author

Listed:
  • Apollonio, D.
  • Glantz, S.A.

Abstract

Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is recommended for tobacco cessation on the basis of pharmaceutical industry research showing its effectiveness when combined with counseling. The tobacco industry opposed NRT when it first appeared in the 1980s but by 2016 was marketing its own NRT products. We used internal tobacco industry documents dated 1960 through 2010 to identify the industry's perceptions of NRT. As early as the 1950s, tobacco companies developed nonsmoked nicotine replacements for cigarettes, but they stopped out of concern that marketing such products would trigger Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes. In the 1990s, after pharmaceutical companies began selling prescription NRT, tobacco companies found that many smokers usedNRT to supplement smoking rather than to quit. In 2009, once the Food and Drug Administration began regulating tobacco, tobacco companies restarted their plans to capture the nicotine market. Although the tobacco industry initially viewed NRT as a threat, it found that smokers often combined NRT with smoking rather than using it as a replacement and began marketing their own NRT products.

Suggested Citation

  • Apollonio, D. & Glantz, S.A., 2017. "Tobacco industry research on nicotine replacement therapy: "if anyone is going to take away our business it should be us"," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(10), pages 1636-1642.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303935_8
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Megan C. Diaz & Elexis C. Kierstead & Domonique Edwards & Yoonsang Kim & Shyanika W. Rose & Sherry Emery & Bushraa Khatib & Michael Liu & Ganna Kostygina, 2022. "Online Tobacco Advertising and Current Chew, Dip, Snuff and Snus Use among Youth and Young Adults, 2018–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303935_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.