IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303865_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of Maryland: The role of firearms

Author

Listed:
  • Nestadt, P.S.
  • Triplett, P.
  • Fowler, D.R.
  • Mojtabai, R.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess whether the use of firearms explains rural-urban differences in suicide rates. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis on all 6196 well-characterized adult suicides in Maryland from 2003 through 2015. We computed rate ratios by using census data and then stratified by sex, with adjustment for age and race. Results. Suicide rates were higher in rural compared with urban counties. However, the higher rural suicide rates were limited to firearm suicides (incident rate ratio [IRR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 2.31). Nonfirearm suicide rates were not significantly higher in rural settings. Furthermore, 89% of firearm suicides occurred in men and the higher rural firearm suicide rate was limited to men (IRR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.09, 1.69). Women were significantly less likely to complete suicide in rural areas (IRR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.43, 0.94), regardless of method. Conclusions. Malefirearmuse drives the increased rate of suicide in rural areas.The opposite associations between urbanicity and suicide in men and women may be driven by the male preference for firearms as a method for committing suicide.

Suggested Citation

  • Nestadt, P.S. & Triplett, P. & Fowler, D.R. & Mojtabai, R., 2017. "Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of Maryland: The role of firearms," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(10), pages 1548-1553.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303865_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303865_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.