IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2017.303690_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the proportion of childhood cancer cases and costs attributable to the environment in California

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson, L.
  • Valle, J.
  • King, G.
  • Mills, P.K.
  • Richardson, M.J.
  • Roberts, E.M.
  • Smith, D.
  • English, P.

Abstract

Objectives.To estimate the proportion of cases and costs of the most common cancers among children aged 0 to 14 years (leukemia, lymphoma, and brain or central nervous system tumors) that were attributable to preventable environmental pollution in California in 2013. Methods. We conducted a literature review to identify preventable environmental hazards associated with childhood cancer.We combined risk estimates with California-specific exposure prevalence estimates to calculate hazard-specific environmental attributable fractions (EAFs). We combined hazard-specific EAFs to estimate EAFs for each cancer and calculated an overall EAF. Estimated economic costs included annual (indirect and direct medical) and lifetime costs. Results. Hazards associated with childhood cancer risks included tobacco smoke, residential exposures, and parental occupational exposures. Estimated EAFs for leukemia, lymphoma, and brain orcentral nervoussystem cancer were21.3% (range = 11.7%-30.9%), 16.1% (range = 15.0%-17.2%), and 2.0% (range = 1.7%-2.2%), respectively. The combined EAF was 15.1% (range = 9.4%-20.7%), representing $18.6 million (range = $11.6 to $25.5 million) in annual costs and $31 million in lifetime costs. Conclusions. Reducing environmental hazards and exposures in California could substantially reduce the human burden of childhood cancer and result in significant annual and lifetime savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson, L. & Valle, J. & King, G. & Mills, P.K. & Richardson, M.J. & Roberts, E.M. & Smith, D. & English, P., 2017. "Estimating the proportion of childhood cancer cases and costs attributable to the environment in California," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(5), pages 756-762.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303690_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303690_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.