IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303360_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Roles of health care providers and patients in initiation of unnecessary papanicolaou testing after total hysterectomy

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, F.
  • Kuo, Y.-F.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess Papanicolaou (Pap) testing use among US adult women with a history of a total hysterectomy for a benign condition and the roles of health care providers and patients in the initiation of screening Pap tests. Methods. We used 2000 to 2013 data from the National Health Interview Survey on women aged 20 years or older who had undergone a hysterectomy (n = 11 616) to estimate unnecessary Pap test use. Results. The percentage of self-reported Pap testing in the preceding 3 years among women who had undergone a hysterectomy decreased from 72.2% in 2000 to 53.3% in 2013. In 2013, 42.4% of women who had undergone a hysterectomy reported receiving recommendations for screening from a health care provider in the past year (32% of which were unnecessary), and 32.1% reported undergoing Pap tests in the preceding year (22.1% of which were unnecessary). Although the majority of Pap tests were performed at a clinician's recommendation, approximately one fourth were initiated by patients without clinician recommendations. Conclusions. Health care providers should advisewomenwhohave had a total hysterectomy for a benign condition on appropriate use of screening services.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, F. & Kuo, Y.-F., 2016. "Roles of health care providers and patients in initiation of unnecessary papanicolaou testing after total hysterectomy," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(11), pages 2005-2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303360_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303360_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.