IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303060_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community health center utilization following the 2008 medicaid expansion in Oregon: Implications for the affordable care act

Author

Listed:
  • Hatch, B.
  • Bailey, S.R.
  • Cowburn, S.
  • Marino, M.
  • Angier, H.
  • DeVoe, J.E.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess longitudinal patterns of community health center (CHC) utilization and the effect of insurance discontinuity after Oregon's 2008 Medicaid expansion (the Oregon Experiment). Methods.Weconducted a retrospective cohort studywith electronic health records and Medicaid data. We divided individuals who gained Medicaid in the Oregon Experiment into those whomaintained (n = 788) or lost (n = 944) insurance coverage.We compared these groups with continuously insured (n = 921) and continuously uninsured (n = 5416) reference groups for community health center utilization rates over a 36-month period. Results. Both newly insured groups increased utilization in the first 6 months. After 6 months, use among those who maintained coverage stabilized at a level consistent with the continuously insured, whereas it returned to baseline for those who lost coverage. Conclusions. Individuals who maintained coverage through Oregon's Medicaid expansion increased long-termutilization of CHCs,whereas thosewithunstable coverage did not. Policy implications. This study predicts long-term increase in CHC utilization following Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and emphasizes the need for policies that support insurance retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatch, B. & Bailey, S.R. & Cowburn, S. & Marino, M. & Angier, H. & DeVoe, J.E., 2016. "Community health center utilization following the 2008 medicaid expansion in Oregon: Implications for the affordable care act," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(4), pages 645-650.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303060_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bailey Yee & Nisa Mohan & Fiona McKenzie & Mona Jeffreys, 2024. "What Interventions Work to Reduce Cost Barriers to Primary Healthcare in High-Income Countries? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303060_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.