IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303053_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of urban water conservation strategies on energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and health: Southern California as a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Sokolow, S.
  • Godwin, H.
  • Cole, B.L.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine how urban water conservation strategies in California cities can affect water and energy conservation efforts, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and benefit public health. Methods.We expanded upon our 2014 health impact assessment of California's urban water conservation strategies by comparing the status quo to 2 options with the greatest potential impact on the interrelated issues of water and energy in California: (1) banning landscape irrigation and (2) expanding alternative water sources (e.g., desalination, recycled water). Results. Among the water conservation strategies evaluated, expanded use of recycled water stood out as the water conservation strategy with potential to reduce water use, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions, with relatively small negative impacts for the public's health. Conclusions. Although the suitability of recycled water for urban uses depends on local climate, geography, current infrastructure, and finances, analyses similar to that presented here can help guide water policy decisions in cities across the globe facing challenges of supplying clean, sustainable water to urban populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sokolow, S. & Godwin, H. & Cole, B.L., 2016. "Impacts of urban water conservation strategies on energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and health: Southern California as a case study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(5), pages 941-948.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303053_5
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303053
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303053_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.