IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2015.302739_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systems approach to improving tdap immunization within 5 community-based family practice settings: Working differently (and better) by transforming the structure and process of care

Author

Listed:
  • Shultz, C.G.
  • Malouin, J.M.
  • Green, L.A.
  • Plegue, M.
  • Greenberg, G.M.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined howfamilymedicine clinic physicians and staffworked in collaborative teams to implement an automated clinical reminder to improve tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccine administration and documentation. Methods. A clinical reminder was developed at 5 University of Michigan family medicine clinics to identify patients 11 to 64 years old who were in need of the Tdap booster vaccine. Quality improvement cycles were used to improve clinic care processes. Immunization rates from 2008 to 2011 were compared with rates at 4 primary care control clinics. Results. Vaccination rates among eligible patients increased from 15.5% to 47.3% within the family medicine clinics and from 14.1% to 30.2% within the control clinics. After adjustment for covariates, family medicine patients had a higher probability of vaccination than control patients during each measurement period (0.17 vs 0.15 at baseline, 0.53 vs 0.22 during year 1, and 0.50 vs 0.30 during year 2). Conclusions. Automated clinical reminders, when designed and implemented via a consensus-based framework that addresses the process of care, can dramatically improve provision of preventive health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Shultz, C.G. & Malouin, J.M. & Green, L.A. & Plegue, M. & Greenberg, G.M., 2015. "A systems approach to improving tdap immunization within 5 community-based family practice settings: Working differently (and better) by transforming the structure and process of care," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 1990-1997.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302739_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302739_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.