IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2015.302728_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Georgia's 20-week abortion ban

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, S.C.M.
  • Gould, H.
  • Upadhyay, U.D.

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to understand more about women affected by a law enacted in January 2013 that led Georgia providers to stop providing abortion services at 24 weeks from a woman's last menstrual period (LMP), and who would be affected if Georgia enforces the law banning abortions at 22 weeks from LMP. Methods. We obtained data on women obtaining abortions at or after 20 weeks from LMP in 2012 and 2013 from 4 Georgia facilities providing later abortion care. We analyzed data descriptively and with the χ2 test. Results. More than half of the women were Black; one fourth were White. Close to half of the women had education beyond high school and a similar proportion had a previous live birth. Eighty-three percent of women at or after 24 weeks came from the South, 4% from the Northeast, and 13% from the Midwest; 99% of those at 20 to 24 weeks were from the South. One third of women at or after 24 weeks and half at 20 to 24 weeks were Georgia residents. Conclusions. These bans will likely affect women throughout the South, as well as the Midwest and Northeast. © 2015, American Public Health Association Inc. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, S.C.M. & Gould, H. & Upadhyay, U.D., 2015. "Implications of Georgia's 20-week abortion ban," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 77-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302728_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302728_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.