IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2015.302675_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice-based research priorities for palliative care: Results from a research-to-practice consensus workshop

Author

Listed:
  • Pillemer, K.
  • Chen, E.K.
  • Riffin, C.
  • Prigerson, H.
  • Schultz, L.
  • Reid, M.C.

Abstract

We employed the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP; workshops held in New York City and Tompkins County, New York, in 2013) model to merge researcher and practitioner views of translational research priorities in palliative care. In the RTP approach, a diverse group of frontline providers generates a research agenda for palliative care in collaboration with researchers. We have presented the major workshop recommendations and contrasted the practice based research priorities with those of previous consensus efforts. We uncovered notable differences and found that the RTP model can produce unique insights into research priorities. Integrating practitioner-identified needs into research priorities for palliative care can contribute to addressing palliative care more effectively as a public health issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Pillemer, K. & Chen, E.K. & Riffin, C. & Prigerson, H. & Schultz, L. & Reid, M.C., 2015. "Practice-based research priorities for palliative care: Results from a research-to-practice consensus workshop," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(11), pages 2237-2244.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302675_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302675
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2015.302675_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.