IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2014.302533_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: A framework for public health

Author

Listed:
  • McLees, A.W.
  • Nawaz, S.
  • Thomas, C.
  • Young, A.

Abstract

We describe an evidencebased framework to define and assess the impact of quality improvement (QI) in public health. Developed to address programmatic and researchidentified eeds for articulating the value of public health QI in aggregate, this framework proposes a standardized set of measures to monitor and improve he efficiency and effectiveness of public health programs and operations. We reviewed the scientific literature and analyzed QI initiatives implemented through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National PublicHealth Improvement Initiative to inform the selection of 5 efficiency and 8 effectiveness measures. This framework provides a model for identifying the types of improvement outcomes targeted by public health QI efforts and a means to understand QI's impact on the practice of public health.

Suggested Citation

  • McLees, A.W. & Nawaz, S. & Thomas, C. & Young, A., 2015. "Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: A framework for public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105, pages 167-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302533_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302533_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.