IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2014.302272_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cervical cancer screening in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: Screening adoption experiences from a midwestern clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Meyerson, B.E.
  • Sayegh, M.A.
  • Davis, A.
  • Arno, J.N.
  • Zimet, G.D.
  • LeMonte, A.M.
  • Williams, J.A.
  • Barclay, L.
  • Van Der Pol, B.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined whether a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic could reach women who had not received a Papanicolau (Pap) test in the past 3 years. We also explored staff attitudes and implementation of cervical cancer screening. Methods: Women (n = 123) aged 30 to 50 years were offered cervical cancer screening in an Indiana STD clinic. We measured effectiveness by the patients' self-reported last Pap test. We explored adoption of screening through focus groups with 34 staff members by documenting their attitudes about cervical cancer screening and screening strategy adaptation. We also documented recruitment and screening implementation. Results. Almost half (47.9%) of participants reported a last Pap test 3 or more years previously; 30%had reported a last Pap more than 5 years ago, and 11.4%had a high-risk test outcome that required referral to colposcopy. Staff supported screening because of mission alignment and perceived patient benefit. Screening adaptations included eligibility, results provision, and follow-up. Conclusions. Cervical cancer screening was possible and potentially beneficial in STD clinics. Future effectiveness-implementation studies should expand to include all female patients, and should examine the degree to which adaptation of selected adoption frameworks is feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Meyerson, B.E. & Sayegh, M.A. & Davis, A. & Arno, J.N. & Zimet, G.D. & LeMonte, A.M. & Williams, J.A. & Barclay, L. & Van Der Pol, B., 2015. "Cervical cancer screening in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: Screening adoption experiences from a midwestern clinic," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105, pages 8-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302272_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302272_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.