IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2014.302125_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, profit, and psychiatric diagnosis: A case study of tobacco use disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Hirshbein, L.D.

Abstract

The idea of tobacco or nicotine dependence as a specific psychiatric diagnosis appeared in 1980 and has evolved through successive editions of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Not surprisingly, the tobacco industry attempted to challenge this diagnosis through behind-the- scenes influence. But another entity put corporate muscle into supporting the diagnosis - the pharmaceutical industry. Psychiatry's ongoing professional challenges have left it vulnerable to multiple professional, social, and commercial forces. The example of tobacco use disorder illustrates that mental health concepts used to develop public health goals and policy need to be critically assessed. I review the conflicting commercial, professional, and political aims that helped to construct psychiatric diagnoses relating to smoking. This history suggests that a diagnosis regarding tobacco has as much to do with social and cultural circumstances as it does with science. © 2014, American Public Health Association Inc. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirshbein, L.D., 2014. "Politics, profit, and psychiatric diagnosis: A case study of tobacco use disorder," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(11), pages 2076-2084.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302125_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302125_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.