IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2013.301726_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I did it for us and i would do it again: Perspectives of rural latinos on providing biospecimens for research

Author

Listed:
  • Hohl, S.D.
  • Gonzalez, C.
  • Carosso, E.
  • Ibarra, G.
  • Thompson, B.

Abstract

Objectives. We elicited perspectives of rural Latino farmworkers and nonfarmworkers about their participation in a community-based participatory pesticides exposure study in which they provided multiple biospecimens. Methods. Between March and April 2012, we conducted semistructured, oneon- one interviews with 39 rural Latino farmworkers and non-farmworkers in Washington State (n = 39). Nineteen open-ended interview questions aimed to elicit participants' attitudes toward, expectations and experiences of biospecimen collection for research, and willingness to participate in future biomedical research studies. We reviewed and coded transcriptions using qualitative principles of grounded theory in which concepts were identified and themes derived from interview data. Results. We grouped themes into 3 major categories: (1) motivation to participate, (2) challenges of participation, and (3) perceived rewards of participation. Many participants were motivated by the perceived importance of the study topic and a desire to acquire and contribute to new knowledge. Respondents said that the benefits of participation outweighed the challenges, and many expressed satisfaction to be able to contribute to research that would benefit future generations. Conclusions. Our findings supported the use of community-based participatory research to engage minorities as participants and invested parties in such studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hohl, S.D. & Gonzalez, C. & Carosso, E. & Ibarra, G. & Thompson, B., 2014. "I did it for us and i would do it again: Perspectives of rural latinos on providing biospecimens for research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 911-916.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301726_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301726_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.