IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300989_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from south dakota's 24/7 sobriety project

Author

Listed:
  • Kilmer, B.
  • Nicosia, N.
  • Heaton, P.
  • Midgette, G.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the public health impact of South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project, an innovative program requiring individuals arrested for or convicted of alcohol-involved offenses to submit to breathalyzer tests twice per day or wear a continuous alcohol monitoring bracelet. Those testing positive are subject to swift, certain, and modest sanctions. Methods. We conducted differences-in-differences analyses comparing changes in arrests for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI), arrests for domestic violence, and traffic crashes in counties with the program to counties without the program. Results. Between 2005 and 2010, more than 17 000 residents of South Dakota-including more than 10% of men aged 18 to 40 years in some counties-had participated in the 24/7 program. At the county level, we documented a 12% reduction in repeat DUI arrests (P = .023) and a 9%reduction in domestic violence arrests (P = .035) following adoption of the program. Evidence for traffic crashes was mixed. Conclusions. In community supervision settings, frequent alcohol testing with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations can reduce problem drinking and improve public health outcomes. Copyright © 2012 by the American Public Health Association®.

Suggested Citation

  • Kilmer, B. & Nicosia, N. & Heaton, P. & Midgette, G., 2013. "Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from south dakota's 24/7 sobriety project," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 37-43.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300989_9
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Buckenmaier & Eugen Dimant & Ann-Christin Posten & Ulrich Schmidt, 2021. "Efficient Institutions and Effective Deterrence: On Timing and Uncertainty of Formal Sanctions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 177-201, April.
    2. Beau Kilmer & Greg Midgette, 2020. "Criminal Deterrence: Evidence from an Individual‐Level Analysis of 24/7 Sobriety," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 801-834, June.
    3. Jenny Williams & Don Weatherburn, 2022. "Can Electronic Monitoring Reduce Reoffending?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(2), pages 232-245, May.
    4. Doleac, Jennifer, 2018. "Strategies to Productively Reincorporate the Formerly-Incarcerated into Communities: A Review of the Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 11646, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Christine A. Goodall & Fergus G. Neville & Damien J. Williams & Peter D. Donnelly, 2016. "Preliminary research informing policy on remote alcohol monitoring in criminal justice: the Scottish experience," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(8), pages 865-872, November.
    6. Bastien Michel & Camille Hémet, 2022. "Custodial versus non-custodial sentences: Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform," PSE Working Papers halshs-03899897, HAL.
    7. Libor Dušek & Christian Traxler, 2024. "Swiftness and Delay of Punishment," CESifo Working Paper Series 10906, CESifo.
    8. Aaron Chalfin & Benjamin Hansen & Rachel Ryley, 2019. "The Minimum Legal Drinking Age and Crime Victimization," NBER Working Papers 26051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Doleac, Jennifer & Mukherjee, Anita, 2018. "The Moral Hazard of Lifesaving Innovations: Naloxone Access, Opioid Abuse, and Crime," IZA Discussion Papers 11489, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Anna Piil Damm & Britt Østergaard Larsen & Helena Skyt Nielsen & Marianne Simonsen, 2017. "Lowering the minimum age of criminal responsibility: Consequences for juvenile crime and education," Economics Working Papers 2017-10, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    11. Hémet, Camille & Michel, Bastien, 2020. "Incarceration versus probation? Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 15047, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Wodahl, Eric J. & Boman, John H. & Garland, Brett E., 2015. "Responding to probation and parole violations: Are jail sanctions more effective than community-based graduated sanctions?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 242-250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300989_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.