IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300950_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population use, sales, and design: A multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009

Author

Listed:
  • Behm, I.
  • Sokol, N.A.
  • Kennedy, R.D.
  • Rees, V.W.
  • Connolly, G.N.

Abstract

Objectives. We compared multiple measures of surveillance of "light" cigarette use, including population use, sales, and design features. Measures were obtained before the 2010 descriptors ban to establish a baseline for future evaluation of the effect of the ban. Methods. We examined light cigarette use, sales, and design using 3 data sets from 2009. We assessed population use using National Survey on Drug Use and Health data. Sales data were drawn from AC Nielsen. We gathered design features, including nicotine concentration, filter ventilation, and weight, from tobacco industry disclosures mandated by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Results. In 2009, 52.7% of smokers self-reported light cigarette use, which accounted for 56.0% of cigarettes sold in the United States. Self-reported light smokers were more likely to be female, White, older, and nondaily smokers. Of design features analyzed, only average filter ventilation differed significantly between light and "full-flavored" cigarettes. Conclusions. Assessment of the impact of the descriptors ban and any future policies surrounding light cigarettes should use multiple surveillance strategies, including measures of population use, sales, and cigarette design.

Suggested Citation

  • Behm, I. & Sokol, N.A. & Kennedy, R.D. & Rees, V.W. & Connolly, G.N., 2013. "Population use, sales, and design: A multidimensional assessment of "light" cigarettes in the United States, 2009," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(3), pages 93-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300950_5
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300950
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300950_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.