IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300680_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expected ethical competencies of public health professionals and graduate curricula in accredited schools of public health in North America

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, L.M.
  • Wright, B.
  • Semaan, S.

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed expected ethics competencies of public health professionals in codes and competencies, reviewed ethics instruction at schools of public health, and recommended ways to bridge the gap between them. Methods: We reviewed the code of ethics and 3 sets of competencies, separating ethics-related competencies into 3 domains: professional, research, and public health. We reviewed ethics course requirements in 2010-2011 on the Internet sites of 46 graduate schools of public health and categorized courses as required, not required, or undetermined. Results: Half of schools (n = 23) required an ethics course for graduation (master's or doctoral level), 21 did not, and 2 had no information. Sixteen of 23 required courses were 3-credit courses. Course content varied from 1 ethics topic to many topics addressing multiple ethics domains. Conclusions: Consistent ethics education and competency evaluation can be accomplished through a combination of a required course addressing the 3 domains, integration of ethics topics in other courses, and "booster" trainings. Enhancing ethics competence of public health professionals is important to address the ethical questions that arise in public health research, surveillance, practice, and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, L.M. & Wright, B. & Semaan, S., 2013. "Expected ethical competencies of public health professionals and graduate curricula in accredited schools of public health in North America," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(5), pages 938-942.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300680_5
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300680
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300680_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.