IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300676_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

2009 pandemic influenza a vaccination of pregnant women - King County, Washington State, 2009-2010

Author

Listed:
  • Kay, M.K.
  • Koelemay, K.G.
  • Kwan-Gett, T.S.
  • Cadwell, B.L.
  • Duchin, J.S.

Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were to estimate 2009 pandemic influenza A (pH1N1) vaccination coverage among pregnant women and identify associated factors. Methods: We distributed a multimodal survey to 5341 women who gave birth between November 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, identified by hospitals in King County, Washington State, with maternity services (n = 11). Results: Of 4205 respondents, 3233 (76.9%) reported that they had received pH1N1 vaccine during pregnancy or within 2 weeks after delivery. Women whose prenatal care provider recommended vaccine had a higher vaccination prevalence than women whose provider did not (81.5% vs 29.6%; adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval = 1.72, 2.58). Vaccination prevalence was lower among women who had received prenatal care from a midwife only compared with women who had received care from other providers (62.9% vs 78.8%; adjusted prevalence ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.83, 0.96). Conclusions: Among pregnant women in King County, pH1N1 vaccination coverage was high. To improve coverage during nonpandemic seasons, influenza vaccine should be recommended routinely by prenatal care providers and vaccination provided where prenatal care is received. Barriers to midwives providing vaccination recommendations to patients should be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay, M.K. & Koelemay, K.G. & Kwan-Gett, T.S. & Cadwell, B.L. & Duchin, J.S., 2012. "2009 pandemic influenza a vaccination of pregnant women - King County, Washington State, 2009-2010," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(S3), pages 368-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300676_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300676
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300676_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.