IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300665_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving adult immunization practices using a team approach in the primary care setting

Author

Listed:
  • Gannon, M.
  • Qaseem, A.
  • Snooks, Q.
  • Snow, V.

Abstract

Objectives. The objective of this study was to improve the immunization rates of primary care practices using a team approach. Methods. Practices performed 35 random chart abstractions at 2 time points and completed a survey about immunizations at baseline and 12 months after intervention. Data were collected for the following immunizations: influenza, pneumococcal, tetanus diphtheria (Td)/tetanus diphtheria pertussis (Tdap), hepatitis A, hepatitis B, meningococcal, varicella, herpes zoster, and human papilloma virus. Between baseline and after intervention, practice teams were given feedback reports and access to an online educational tool, and attended quality improvement coaching conference calls. Results. Statistically significant improvements were seen for Td/Tdap (45.6% pre-intervention, 55.0% post-intervention; P ≤ .01), herpes zoster (12.3% preintervention, 19.3% post-intervention; P ≤ .01), and pneumococcal (52.2% preintervention, 74.5% post-intervention; P ≤ .01) immunizations. Data also revealed an increase in the number of physicians who discussed herpes zoster and pneumococcal vaccinations with their patients (23.2% pre-intervention, 43.3% post-intervention; P ≤ .01 and 19.9% pre-intervention, 43.0% post-intervention; P ≤ .01, respectively) as well as an increase in physicians using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention immunization schedule (52.9% pre-intervention, 88.2% post-intervention; P ≤ .02). Conclusions. The immunization rates of the primary care practices involved in this study improved. (Am J Public Health.

Suggested Citation

  • Gannon, M. & Qaseem, A. & Snooks, Q. & Snow, V., 2012. "Improving adult immunization practices using a team approach in the primary care setting," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(7), pages 46-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300665_8
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300665_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.