IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2011.300622_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public health detailing of primary care providers: New York City's experience, 2003-2010

Author

Listed:
  • Dresser, M.G.
  • Short, L.
  • Wedemeyer, L.
  • Bredow, V.L.
  • Sacks, R.
  • Larson, K.
  • Levy, J.
  • Silver, L.D.

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the effectiveness of the Public Health Detailing Program in helping primary care providers and their staff to improve patient care on public health challenges. Methods: We analyzed reported changes in clinical practice or behavior by examining providers' retention and implementation of recommendations for campaigns. Results: During each campaign, 170 to 443 providers and 136 to 221 sites were reached. Among assessed providers who indicated changes in their practice behavior, the following statistically significant increases occurred from baseline to follow-up. Reported screening for clinical preventive services increased, including routinely screening for intimate partner violence (14%-42%). Clinical management increased, such as prescribing longer-lasting supplies of medicine (29%-42%). Lifestyle modification and behavior change, such as recommending increased physical activity to patients with high cholesterol levels, rose from 52% to 73%. Self-management goal setting with patients increased, such as using a clinical checkbook to track hemoglobin A1c goals (28% to 43%). Conclusions: Data suggest that public health detailing can be effective for linking public health agencies and their recommendations to providers and influencing reported changes in clinical practice behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Dresser, M.G. & Short, L. & Wedemeyer, L. & Bredow, V.L. & Sacks, R. & Larson, K. & Levy, J. & Silver, L.D., 2012. "Public health detailing of primary care providers: New York City's experience, 2003-2010," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(S3), pages 342-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2011.300622_5
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2011.300622_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.