IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2011.300363_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost comparison of 2 mass vaccination campaigns against influenza a H1N1 in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Kansagra, S.M.
  • McGinty, M.D.
  • Morgenthau, B.M.
  • Marquez, M.L.
  • Rosselli-Fraschilla, A.
  • Zucker, J.R.
  • Farley, T.A.

Abstract

Objectives. We estimated and compared total costs and costs per dose administered for 2 influenza A 2009 monovalent vaccine campaigns in New York City: an elementary school-located campaign targeting enrolled children aged 4 years and older, and a community-based points-of-dispensing campaign for anyone aged 4 years and older. Methods. We determined costs from invoices or we estimated costs. We obtained vaccination data from the Citywide Immunization Registry and reports from the community points of dispensing. Results. The school campaign delivered approximately 202089 vaccines for $17.9 million and $88 per dose. The community campaign delivered 49986 vaccines for $7.6 million and $151 per dose. At projected capacity, the school campaign could have delivered 371827 doses at $53 each or $13 each when we excluded the value of in-kind resources. The community points of dispensing could have administered 174000 doses at $51 each or $24 each when we excluded the value of in-kind resources. Conclusions. The school campaign delivered vaccines at a lower cost per dose than did the community campaign. Had demand been higher, both campaigns may have delivered vaccine at lower, more comparable cost per dose.

Suggested Citation

  • Kansagra, S.M. & McGinty, M.D. & Morgenthau, B.M. & Marquez, M.L. & Rosselli-Fraschilla, A. & Zucker, J.R. & Farley, T.A., 2012. "Cost comparison of 2 mass vaccination campaigns against influenza a H1N1 in New York City," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(7), pages 1378-1383.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2011.300363_1
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2011.300363_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.