IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2010.199695_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing credibility: The national energy management institute and the tobacco institute's strategy for indoor air quality

Author

Listed:
  • Campbell, R.B.
  • Balbach, E.D.

Abstract

Objectives. We studied tobacco industry efforts during the 1980s and 1990s to promote the National Energy Management Institute (NEMI), a nonprofit organization, as an authority on indoor air quality as part of the industry's strategy to oppose smoke-free worksite policies. Methods. We analyzed tobacco industry documents, conducted literature searches in Lexis-Nexis for background and historical literature, and reviewed relevant public health and policy literature. Results. The tobacco industry provided more than US $ 6 million to NEMI to establish it as an authority on indoor air quality and to work with it to undermine support for smoke-free air policies by promoting ventilation as a solution to indoor air quality problems. Tobacco industry support for NEMI was not publicly disclosed. Conclusions. NEMI was a valuable ally for the tobacco industry through NEMI's ties to organized labor, its technical background, and its status as a third-party actor. NEMI also helped the industry to portray ventilation to improve overall indoor air quality and smoke-free worksites as an either-or choice; in fact, both can improve worker health.

Suggested Citation

  • Campbell, R.B. & Balbach, E.D., 2011. "Manufacturing credibility: The national energy management institute and the tobacco institute's strategy for indoor air quality," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(3), pages 497-503.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.199695_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.199695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2010.199695
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2010.199695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.199695_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.