IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2010.196048_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of peer-driven intervention on rates of screening for AIDS clinical trials among African Americans and Hispanics

Author

Listed:
  • Gwadz, M.V.
  • Leonard, N.R.
  • Cleland, C.M.
  • Riedel, M.
  • Banfield, A.
  • Mildvan, D.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the efficacy of a peer-driven intervention to increase rates of screening for AIDS clinical trials among African Americans and Hispanics living with HIV/AIDS. Methods: We used a randomized controlled trial design to examine the efficacy of peer-driven intervention (6 hours of structured sessions and the opportunity to educate 3 peers) compared with a time-matched control intervention. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (n=342; 43.9% female; 64.9% African American, 26.6% Hispanic). Most participants (93.3%) completed intervention sessions and 64.9% recruited or educated peers. Baseline and post-baseline interviews (94.4% completed) were computer-assisted. A mixed model was used to examine intervention effects on screening. Results: Screening was much more likely in the peer-driven intervention than in the control arm (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=55.0; z=5.49, P

Suggested Citation

  • Gwadz, M.V. & Leonard, N.R. & Cleland, C.M. & Riedel, M. & Banfield, A. & Mildvan, D., 2011. "The effect of peer-driven intervention on rates of screening for AIDS clinical trials among African Americans and Hispanics," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(6), pages 1096-1102.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.196048_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2010.196048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2010.196048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.196048_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.