IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2010.191775_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a mixed-methods approach to identify health concerns in an African American community

Author

Listed:
  • Weathers, B.
  • Barg, F.K.
  • Bowman, M.
  • Briggs, V.
  • Delmoor, E.
  • Kumanyika, S.
  • Johnson, J.C.
  • Purnell, J.
  • Rogers, R.
  • Halbert, C.H.

Abstract

Objectives. We used qualitative and quantitative data collection methods to identify the health concerns of African American residents in an urban community and analyzed the extent to which there were consistencies across methods in the concerns identified. Methods. We completed 9 focus groups with 51 residents, 27 key informant interviews, and 201 community health surveys with a random sample of community residents to identify the health issues participants considered of greatest importance. We then compared the issues identified through these methods. Results. Focus group participants and key informants gave priority to cancer and cardiovascular diseases, but most respondents in the community health survey indicated that sexually transmitted diseases, substance abuse, and obesity were conditions in need of intervention. How respondents ranked their concerns varied in the qualitative versus the quantitative methods. Conclusions. Using qualitative and quantitative approaches simultaneously is useful in determining community health concerns. Although quantitative approaches yield concrete evidence of community needs, qualitative approaches provide a context for how these issues can be addressed. Researchers should develop creative ways to address multiple issues that arise when using a mixedmethods approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Weathers, B. & Barg, F.K. & Bowman, M. & Briggs, V. & Delmoor, E. & Kumanyika, S. & Johnson, J.C. & Purnell, J. & Rogers, R. & Halbert, C.H., 2011. "Using a mixed-methods approach to identify health concerns in an African American community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(11), pages 2087-2092.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.191775_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2010.191775
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2010.191775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2010.191775_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.