IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.158485_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of cognitive impairment on screening mammography use in older US women

Author

Listed:
  • Mehta, K.M.
  • Fung, K.Z.
  • Kistler, C.E.
  • Chang, A.
  • Walter, L.C.

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated mammography rates for cognitively impaired women in the context of their life expectancies, given that guidelines do not recommend screening mammography in women with limited life expectancies because harms outweigh benefits. Methods. We evaluated Medicare claims for women aged 70 years or older from the 2002 wave of the Health and Retirement Study to determine which women had screening mammography. We calculated population-based estimates of 2-year screening mammography prevalence and 4-year survival by cognitive status and age. Results. Women with severe cognitive impairment had lower rates of mammography (18%) compared with women with normal cognition (45%). Nationally, an estimated 120000 screening mammograms were performed among women with severe cognitive impairment despite this group's median survival of 3.3 years (95% confidence interval = 2.8, 3.7). Cognitively impaired women who had high net worth and were married had screening rates approaching 50%. Conclusions. Although severe cognitive impairment is associated with lower screening mammography rates, certain subgroups with cognitive impairment are often screened despite lack of probable benefit. Given the limited life expectancy of women with severe cognitive impairment, guidelines should explicitly recommend against screening these women.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehta, K.M. & Fung, K.Z. & Kistler, C.E. & Chang, A. & Walter, L.C., 2010. "Impact of cognitive impairment on screening mammography use in older US women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(10), pages 1917-1923.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.158485_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.158485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.158485
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.158485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David H. Howard & Ya-Lin Huang, 2012. "Serious Health Events and Discontinuation of Routine Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(4), pages 627-635, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.158485_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.