IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.152298_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The NYC condom: Use and acceptability of New York City's Branded condom

Author

Listed:
  • Burke, R.C.
  • Wilson, J.
  • Bernstein, K.T.
  • Grosskopf, N.
  • Murrill, C.
  • Cutler, B.
  • Sweeney, M.
  • Begier, E.M.

Abstract

We assessed awareness and experience with the NYC Condom via surveys at 7 public events targeting priority condom distribution populations during 2007. Most respondents (76%) were aware of NYC Condoms. Of those that had obtained them, 69% had used them. Most (80%) wanted alternative condoms offered for free: 22% wanted ultra-thin, 18% extrastrength, and 14% larger-size. Six months after the NYC Condom launch, we found high levels of awareness and use. Because many wanted alternative condoms, the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene began distributing the 3 most-requested alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Burke, R.C. & Wilson, J. & Bernstein, K.T. & Grosskopf, N. & Murrill, C. & Cutler, B. & Sweeney, M. & Begier, E.M., 2009. "The NYC condom: Use and acceptability of New York City's Branded condom," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(12), pages 2178-2180.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.152298_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.152298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.152298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.152298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William D. Evans & Alec Ulasevich & Megan Hatheway & Bidia Deperthes, 2020. "Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature on Global Condom Promotion Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.152298_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.