IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.150318_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Yankaskas, B.C.
  • Dickens, P.
  • Michael Bowling, J.
  • Jarman, M.P.
  • Luken, K.
  • Salisbury, K.
  • Halladay, J.
  • Lorenz, C.E.

Abstract

Objectives. Given the lack of screening mammography studies specific to women with disabilities, we compared reasons offered by women with and without disabilities for not scheduling routine screening visits. Methods. We surveyed women in the Carolina Mammography Registry aged 40 to 79 years (n = 2970), who had been screened from 2001 through 2003 and did not return for at least 3 years, to determine reasons for noncompliance. In addition to women without disabilities, women with visual, hearing, physical, and multiple (any combination of visual, hearing, and physical) limitations were included in our analyses. Results. The most common reasons cited by women both with and without disabilities for not returning for screening were lack of a breast problem, pain and expense associated with a mammogram, and lack of a physician recommendation. Women with disabilities were less likely to receive a physician recommendation. Conclusions. Women with disabilities are less likely than those without disabilities to receive a physician recommendation for screening mammography, and this is particularly the case among older women and those with multiple disabilities. There is a need for equitable preventive health care in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Yankaskas, B.C. & Dickens, P. & Michael Bowling, J. & Jarman, M.P. & Luken, K. & Salisbury, K. & Halladay, J. & Lorenz, C.E., 2010. "Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(5), pages 947-953.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.150318_1
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.150318
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.150318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosemary B. Hughes & Susan Robinson-Whelen & Carly Knudson, 2022. "Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Puchong Inchai & Wen-Chen Tsai & Li-Ting Chiu & Pei-Tseng Kung, 2022. "Inequality in the Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening between Women with and without Disabilities in Taiwan: A Propensity-Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Lung-Chang Chien & Anjali D Deshpande & Donna B Jeffe & Mario Schootman, 2012. "Influence of Primary Care Physician Availability and Socioeconomic Deprivation on Breast Cancer from 1988 to 2008: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Kath Peters & Antoinette Cotton, 2015. "Barriers to breast cancer screening in Australia: experiences of women with physical disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 563-572, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.150318_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.