IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.138461_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competing initiatives: A new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures

Author

Listed:
  • Tung, G.J.
  • Hendlin, Y.H.
  • Glantz, S.A.

Abstract

To describe how the tobacco and gaming industries opposed clean indoor air voter initiatives in 2006, we analyzed media records and government and other publicly available documents and conducted interviews with knowledgeable individuals. In an attempt to avoid strict "smoke free" regulations pursued by health groups via voter initiatives in Arizona, Ohio, and Nevada, in 2006, the tobacco and gaming industries sponsored competing voter initiatives for alternative laws. Health groups succeeded in defeating the pro-tobacco competing initiatives because they were able to dispel confusion and create a head-tohead competition by associating each campaign with its respective backer and instructing voters to vote "no" on the pro-tobacco initiative in addition to voting "yes" on the health group initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Tung, G.J. & Hendlin, Y.H. & Glantz, S.A., 2009. "Competing initiatives: A new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(3), pages 430-439.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.138461_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.138461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.138461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.138461_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.