IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.125617_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining what we stand for will guide what we do: Community priorities, ethical research paradigms, and research with vulnerable populations

Author

Listed:
  • Perez, L.M.
  • Treadwell, H.M.

Abstract

Prisoners, ex-offenders, and the communities they belong to constitute a distinct and highly vulnerable population, and research must be sensitive to their priorities. In light of recent suggestions that scientific experimentation involving prisoners be reconsidered, community-based participatory research can be a valuable tool for determining the immediate concerns of prisoners, such as the receipt of high-quality and dignified health care inside and outside prisons. In building research agendas, more must be done to ensure the participation of communities affected by the resulting policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Perez, L.M. & Treadwell, H.M., 2009. "Determining what we stand for will guide what we do: Community priorities, ethical research paradigms, and research with vulnerable populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(2), pages 201-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.125617_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.125617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.125617
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.125617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Northway & Joyce Howarth & Lynne Evans, 2015. "Participatory research, people with intellectual disabilities and ethical approval: making reasonable adjustments to enable participation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 573-581, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.125617_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.