IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2007.114447_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistent disparities in the use of health care along the US-Mexico border: An ecological perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bastida, E.
  • Brown III, H.S.
  • Pagán, J.A.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined disparities in health care use among US-Mexico border residents, with a focus on the unique binational environment of the region, to determine factors that may influence health care use in Mexico. Methods. Data were from 2 waves of a population-based study of 1048 Latino residents of selected Texas border counties. Logistic regression models examined predictors of health insurance coverage. Results from these models were used to examine regional patterns of health care use. Results. Of the respondents younger than 65 years, 60% reported no health insurance coverage. The uninsured were 7 and 3 times more likely in waves 3 and 4, respectively, to use medical care in Mexico than were the insured. Preference for medical care in Mexico was an important predictor. Conclusions. For those who were chronically ill, old, poor, or burdened by the lengthy processing of their documents by immigration authorities, the United States provided the only source of health care. For some, Mexico may lessen the burden at the individual level, but it does not lessen the aggregate burden of providing highly priced care to the region's neediest. Health disparities will continue unless policies are enacted to expand health care accessibility in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastida, E. & Brown III, H.S. & Pagán, J.A., 2008. "Persistent disparities in the use of health care along the US-Mexico border: An ecological perspective," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(11), pages 1987-1995.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.114447_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2007.114447
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2007.114447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horton, Sarah & Cole, Stephanie, 2011. "Medical returns: Seeking health care in Mexico," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1846-1852, June.
    2. Miguel Ángel Bonilla Zarrazaga & Jorge Lara Álvarez, 2015. "Cost effect in the choice of healthcare provider in a mixed system The case of Mexico," Economia y Sociedad., Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Facultad de Economia, issue 32, pages 41-52, Enero-Jun.
    3. Christina J. Diaz & Stephanie M. Koning & Ana P. Martinez-Donate, 2016. "Moving Beyond Salmon Bias: Mexican Return Migration and Health Selection," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 2005-2030, December.
    4. Madden, Erin Fanning, 2015. "Cultural Health Capital on the margins: Cultural resources for navigating healthcare in communities with limited access," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 145-152.
    5. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Carr, Jon C. & McKelvie, Alexander & Spivack, April & Lerman, Michael P., 2023. "Health resourcefulness behaviors: Implications of work-health resource trade-offs for the self-employed," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    6. Jang, Sou Hyun, 2016. "First-generation Korean immigrants’ barriers to healthcare and their coping strategies in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 93-100.
    7. Garcia, Carolyn & Pagán, José A. & Hardeman, Rachel, 2010. "Context matters: Where would you be the least worse off in the US if you were uninsured?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 76-83, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.114447_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.