IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2006.092981_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: The Wisconsin County health rankings

Author

Listed:
  • Peppard, P.E.
  • Kindig, D.A.
  • Dranger, E.
  • Jovaag, A.
  • Remington, P.L.

Abstract

United Health Foundation's America's Health Rankings, which ranks the states from "least healthy" to "healthiest," receives wide press coverage and promotes discussion of public health issues. The University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute used the United Health Foundation's model to develop the Wisconsin County Health Rankings ("Health Rankings") from existing county-level data. The institute first released the rankings in 2004. A survey of the Wisconsin county health officers indicated that they intend to use the rankings for needs assessment, program planning, and discussion with county health boards. The institute implemented many of the health officers' suggestions for improvement of the rankings in subsequent editions. The methods employed to create the rankings should be applicable in other states.

Suggested Citation

  • Peppard, P.E. & Kindig, D.A. & Dranger, E. & Jovaag, A. & Remington, P.L., 2008. "Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: The Wisconsin County health rankings," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 209-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2006.092981_4
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles Courtemanche & Samir Soneji & Rusty Tchernis, 2013. "Modeling Area-Level Health Rankings," NBER Working Papers 19450, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. McCarthy, Ian M., 2016. "Eliminating composite bias in treatment effects estimates: Applications to quality of life assessment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-58.
    3. Nesson, Erik T. & Robinson, Joshua J., 2015. "An information theory based framework for the measurement of population health," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 86-103.
    4. Schwarzkopf, David L., 2019. "Persistent peers and the rhetoric of state economic competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 46-53.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2006.092981_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.