IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2005.076349_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and white women

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, B.A.
  • Reams, K.
  • Calvocoressi, L.
  • Dailey, A.
  • Kasl, S.V.
  • Liston, N.M.

Abstract

Objective. We examined whether African American women were as likely as White women to receive the results of a recent mammogram and to self-report results that matched the mammography radiology report (i.e., were adequately communicated). We also sought to determine whether the adequacy of communication was the same for normal and abnormal results. Methods. From a prospective cohort study of mammography screening, we compared self-reported mammogram results, which were collected by telephone interview, to results listed in the radiology record of 411 African American and 734 White women who underwent screening in 5 hospital-based facilities in Connecticut between October 1996 and January 1998. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of inadequate communication of mammography results. Results. It was significantly more common for African American women to experience inadequate communication of screening mammography results compared with White women, after adjustment for sociodemographic, access-to-care, biomedical, and psychosocial factors. Abnormal mammogram results resulted in inadequate communication for African American women but not White women (P

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, B.A. & Reams, K. & Calvocoressi, L. & Dailey, A. & Kasl, S.V. & Liston, N.M., 2007. "Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and white women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(3), pages 531-538.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.076349_8
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2005.076349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2005.076349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.076349_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.