IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2005.071969_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: The case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco

Author

Listed:
  • McDaniel, P.A.
  • Solomon, G.
  • Malone, R.E.

Abstract

In the United States, companies that use their own funds to test consumer products on their employees are subject to few regulations. Using previously undisclosed tobacco industry documents, we reviewed the history of that industry's efforts to create internal guidelines on the conditions to be met before employee taste testers could evaluate cigarettes made from tobacco treated with experimental pesticides. This history highlights 2 potential ethical issues raised by unregulated industrial research: conflict of interest and lack of informed consent. To ensure compliance with accepted ethical standards, an independent federal office should be established to oversee industrial research involving humans exposed to experimental or increased quantities of ingested, inhaled, or absorbed chemical agents.

Suggested Citation

  • McDaniel, P.A. & Solomon, G. & Malone, R.E., 2006. "The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: The case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(1), pages 37-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.071969_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2005.071969
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2005.071969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.071969_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.