IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2005.067371_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population-level changes in folate intake by age, gender, and race/ethnicity after folic acid fortification

Author

Listed:
  • Bentley, T.G.K.
  • Willett, W.C.
  • Weinstein, M.C.
  • Kuntz, K.M.

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to quantify the impact of the 1998 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) folic acid fortification policy by estimating folate intake at the population level. Methods. We analyzed total folate intake levels (from food and supplements) according to gender, age, and race/ethnicity, using data from 2 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We measured pre- and postfortification folate intake distributions, adjusted for measurement error, and examined proportions of the population who reached certain thresholds of daily total folate intake. Results. Mean daily food and total folate intake increased by approximately 100 μg/day after fortification. The proportion of women aged 15-44 years who consume more than 400 μg/day of folate has increased since fortification, but has not yet reached the FDA's 50% target and varies by race/ethnicity from 23% to 33%. Among persons aged 65 years and older who may be at risk for masking a vitamin B12 deficiency, the percentage who consume more than 1000 μg/day (the "tolerable upper intake level") has at least doubled among Whites and Black men, but has remained less than 5% for all groups. Conclusions. Since fortification, folic acid intake among the US population has increased, and there are substantial variations by age, gender, and race/ethnicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bentley, T.G.K. & Willett, W.C. & Weinstein, M.C. & Kuntz, K.M., 2006. "Population-level changes in folate intake by age, gender, and race/ethnicity after folic acid fortification," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(11), pages 2040-2047.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.067371_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2005.067371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2005.067371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2005.067371_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.