IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2004.061556_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: Balancing privacy and scientific issues

Author

Listed:
  • Beskow, L.M.
  • Sandler, R.S.
  • Weinberger, M.

Abstract

Cancer registries are a valuable resource for recruiting participants for public health-oriented research, although such recruitment raises potentially competing concerns about patient privacy and participant accrual. We surveyed US central cancer registries about their policies for research contact with patients, and results showed substantial variation. The strategy used most frequently (37.5% of those that allowed patient contact), which was among the least restrictive, was for investigators to notify patients' physicians and then contact patients with an opt-out approach. The most restrictive strategy was for registry staff to obtain physician permission and contact patients with an opt-in approach. Population-based studies enhance cancer control efforts, and registry policies can affect researchers' ability to conduct such studies. Further discussion about balanced recruitment approaches that protect patient privacy and encourage beneficial research is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Beskow, L.M. & Sandler, R.S. & Weinberger, M., 2006. "Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: Balancing privacy and scientific issues," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(11), pages 1920-1926.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.061556_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linda Fraczyk & Helen Godfrey, 2010. "Perceived levels of satisfaction with the preoperative assessment service experienced by patients undergoing general anaesthesia in a day surgery setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2849-2859, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.061556_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.