IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2004.056333_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform

Author

Listed:
  • Neufeld, P.J.

Abstract

Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc should have an extraordinary impact on criminal litigation, because there is rarely a criminal trial that does not rely on some form of expert testimony. In fact, it is almost irrelevant. Despite the frequency of prosecution proffered scientific and expert testimony in criminal cases, Daubert is rarely invoked to challenge it. In civil cases, when expert testimony is challenged in criminal proceedings, the outcome could not be more different. Because most violent crimes are committed by the poor, their court appointed advocates-overworked and underfinanced-are not up to the challenge. In the absence of a system of effective representation, Daubert will not improve scientific evidence in criminal cases. The only way to guard against the misapplication of forensic science is to impose controls and reforms long before the cases come to court.

Suggested Citation

  • Neufeld, P.J., 2005. "The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(S1), pages 107-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.056333_1
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2004.056333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Herbert M. Kritzer & Darryn C. Beckstrom, 2007. "Daubert in the States: Diffusion of a New Approach to Expert Evidence in the Courts," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(4), pages 983-1006, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.056333_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.