IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jaterr/2018p79-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 implementation framework for the producing industry

Author

Listed:
  • Guenther Schuh

    (Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany)

  • Christoph Kelzenberg

    (Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany)

  • Jan Wiese

    (Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany)

  • Felix Stracke

    (Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany)

Abstract

The competitive pressure induced by progressing globalization has forced companies to find new ways of differentiation. Industry 4.0 as the synonym for the next significant step in value creation advancement offers new technologies and procedures to obtain further improvements in competitiveness. The real-time networking of people, machines and objects is not only an opportunity to leverage productivity potentials; it also enables new data-driven business models to achieve increase in revenues. Although the concept and enablers of industry 4.0 are widely known across the producing industry, companies struggle with its successful and sustainable implementation. Due to the often insufficient embedding of individual solutions in a coherent overall concept, implemented solutions cannot exploit potential synergies within the company. The presented paper introduces a framework to centrally control and synchronize Industry 4.0 activities within a company. By integrating bottom-up and top-down perceptions the framework facilitates the early identification and assessment of potential industry 4.0 applications as well as efficient development of specific solutions up to the implementation in series production. Consisting of an operationalization process and an organizational model optimized for horizontal and vertical exchange within the company, the framework enables a faster and more robust implementation of industry 4.0

Suggested Citation

  • Guenther Schuh & Christoph Kelzenberg & Jan Wiese & Felix Stracke, 2018. "Industry 4.0 implementation framework for the producing industry," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(2), pages 79-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jaterr:2018:p:79-90
    DOI: 10.20474/jater-4.2.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jater4.2.4.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jater-4.2.4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jater-4.2.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Mohamed Abduelmula & Martin Birkett & Chris Connor, 2017. "A Mixed Method Approach to Investigate the Lack of Lean Manufacturing Implementation in Libya," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 3(3), pages 111-116.
    3. Jae-woongYoo & Min-Kyu Lee & Wan Soo Lee, 2016. "Asymmetrical corporate responses to economic information: Applying the firm size effect," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(1), pages 25-37.
    4. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    5. Kindström, Daniel & Kowalkowski, Christian & Sandberg, Erik, 2013. "Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1063-1073.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, 2006. "Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 514-524, August.
    8. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    9. Hanisom Abdullah & Ahmad Kamil Jamaai, 2016. "Properties of Eco-Brick manufactured using Kenaf Fibre as matrix," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 2(1), pages 20-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Mei Tung, 2018. "Vertical integration for smart manufacturing-The dynamic capability perspective," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(2), pages 70-78.
    2. Nay Chi Khin Khin Oo & Sirisuhk Rakthin, 2022. "Integrative Review of Absorptive Capacity’s Role in Fostering Organizational Resilience and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Lydia Bals & Jon F. Kirchoff & Kai Foerstl, 2016. "Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 102-116, December.
    5. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    6. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    7. Kindström, Daniel & Kowalkowski, Christian & Sandberg, Erik, 2013. "Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1063-1073.
    8. Abel D Alonso & Seng Kok, 2018. "A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach in the context of a region’s international attractiveness: The recent case of Western Australia," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(3), pages 307-328, May.
    9. Patrizia Pastore & Antonio Ricciardi & Silvia Tommaso, 2020. "Contractual networks: an organizational model to reduce the competitive disadvantage of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Europe’s less developed regions. A survey in southern Italy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1503-1535, December.
    10. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    11. Jeandri Robertson, 2020. "Competition in Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theory Elaboration Approach Using a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Shah, Tushar R., 2022. "Can big data analytics help organisations achieve sustainable competitive advantage? A developmental enquiry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Chulin Pan & Yufeng Jiang & Mingliang Wang & Shuang Xu & Ming Xu & Yixin Dong, 2021. "How Can Agricultural Corporate Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Green Intellectual Capital? A New Environmental Management Approach to Green Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Enkel, Ellen & Sagmeister, Veronika, 2020. "External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    15. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    16. Adrián Kovács & Bart Looy & Bruno Cassiman, 2015. "Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 951-983, September.
    17. Buccieri, Dominic & Javalgi, Raj G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2023. "Role of opportunity creation between reconfiguration and innovation: Insights from emerging market international new ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    18. Ahsan, Mujtaba & Fernhaber, Stephanie A., 2019. "Multinational Enterprises: Leveraging a Corporate International Entrepreneurship Lens for New Insights Into Subsidiary Initiatives," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 51-65.
    19. Henk W. Volberda & Nicolai J. Foss & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2010. "PERSPECTIVE---Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 931-951, August.
    20. Tomas Santa‐Maria & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2022. "How do incumbent firms innovate their business models for the circular economy? Identifying micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1308-1333, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jaterr:2018:p:79-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/10 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.