Author
Listed:
- M. S. R. Ifani
(Department of Medical Faculty of Syiah Kuala University, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Aceh, Indonesia)
- Safrizal Rahman
(Department of Orthopaedic of Medical Faculty of Syiah Kuala University, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Aceh, Indonesia)
- Mirnasari Amirsyah
(Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Medical Faculty of Syiah Kuala University, Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Aceh, Indonesia)
Abstract
Wound healing is a complicated, multi-step process that can be divided into three major phases: inflammation, proliferation, and scar formation/remodeling. The compartmentalization of this process into discrete stages gives the illusion of simplicity, but in reality it is much more complicated. For efficient healing to occur, complex interac- tions between multiple cell types, soluble factors and extracellular matrix components are required to re-build the tissue, Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is produced from the blood by centrifugation, which concentrates platelets along with several bioactive factors that have the ability to promote various aspects of tissue regeneration and protection The rationale for use and therapeutic potential of a high concentration of platelets is based on their capacity to supply and release supraphysiologic amounts of essential growth factors and cytokines from their alpha granules to provide a regenerative stimulus that augments healing and promotes repair in tissues. Unlike PRP, Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) does not have many platelets but PPP has its own unique healing properties.This study was an experimental study using the design of the post- test only control group design in an experimental laboratory. The research subjects were divided into 3 groups: 10 rats with incision wound at the cruris and given injection of PRP, then 10 white rats with incision wound at the cruris and were given injection of platelet-poor plasma and 10 rats with incision wound at the cruris for control. The wound area was measured over 7 days, the wound was harvested and histological analysis was performed including counting of collagen finding, and will be analyzed by ANOVA test. The results showed that the amount of collagen between PRP and PPP differ significantly with p velue 0.000 (p
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jahmss:2018:p:65-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Balachandar S. Sayapathi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/13 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.