IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jabsss/2019p269-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of how agile manufacturing capabilities could be used differently in plants within the footloose and rooted subnetworks of the global production network

Author

Listed:
  • Sepvina Mutikasari

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper provides a literature review study to investigate how Agile Manufacturing (AM) capabilities could be used in different plants within a company's Global Production Network (GNP). To do this, this paper makes use of Ferdows, Vereecke, and De Meyer (2016) subnetworks positions framework. Each of the subnetwork positions has its own manufacturing characteristics and missions. From the four subnetworks, this paper focused on the main two, footloose and rooted. 17 articles were analyzed and this paper found that there are four major AM capabilities categories, namely responsiveness, flexibility, integration, and competency. Each of the AM capabilities categories could be used differently in each of the subnetworks depending on the focus factors emphasized in each category. With that, this paper has presented how AM system capabilities could help plants in the footloose and rooted subnetworks to achieve their missions. Further, this study provides an early phase to understand how AM system could accommodates different plants positions in the GPN. This study also set out an insight that, despite being founded 29 years ago, AM system with their capabilities, is still relevant to be continuously implemented in the present time. This paper does not provide any empirical validation yet for the findings. Thus, this paper also provide avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepvina Mutikasari, 2019. "Analysis of how agile manufacturing capabilities could be used differently in plants within the footloose and rooted subnetworks of the global production network," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(5), pages 269-280.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:269-280
    DOI: 10.20474/jabs-5.5.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jabs5.5.2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jabs-5.5.2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jabs-5.5.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Surya Nuriansyah & Asrid Juniar & Redawati, 2017. "Factors Affecting Dividend Payout Ratio of Food and Beverage Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 3(6), pages 229-238.
    2. Prince, J. & Kay, J. M., 2003. "Combining lean and agile characteristics: Creation of virtual groups by enhanced production flow analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 305-318, September.
    3. Ben Naylor, J. & Naim, Mohamed M & Berry, Danny, 1999. "Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 107-118, May.
    4. Kay, John, 1996. "The Business of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2011. "On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 342-354, May.
    2. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    3. Agarwal, Ashish & Shankar, Ravi & Tiwari, M.K., 2006. "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 211-225, August.
    4. Purvis, Laura & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 100-111.
    5. Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2018. "Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 118-138.
    6. François Fulconis & Gérard Roveillo & Gilles Paché, 2008. "Transport, poor relation or pillar of contemporary supply networks? [Le transport, parent pauvre ou pièce maîtresse des schémas d’approvisionnement contemporains ?]," Post-Print hal-02491721, HAL.
    7. Nurmilaakso, Juha-Miikka, 2008. "Adoption of e-business functions and migration from EDI-based to XML-based e-business frameworks in supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 721-733, June.
    8. Jacobs, Mark A. & Yu, Wantao & Chavez, Roberto, 2016. "The effect of internal communication and employee satisfaction on supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 60-70.
    9. Davies, Jennifer & Sharifi, Hossein & Lyons, Andrew & Forster, Rick & Elsayed, Omar Khaled Shokry Mohamed, 2024. "Non-fungible tokens: The missing ingredient for sustainable supply chains in the metaverse age?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Natalia Szozda & Artur Świerczek, 2022. "Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 873-898, June.
    11. White, A. & Daniel, E.M. & Mohdzain, M., 2005. "The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 396-410.
    12. Frankel, Robert, 2006. "The role and relevance of refocused inventory: Supply chain management solutions," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 275-286.
    13. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Lyons, Andrew Charles & Um, Juneho & Sharifi, Hossein, 2020. "Product variety, customisation and business process performance: A mixed-methods approach to understanding their relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    16. Vaagen, Hajnalka & Wallace, Stein W., 2008. "Product variety arising from hedging in the fashion supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 431-455, August.
    17. Giuseppe Danese & Luigi Mittone, 2015. "Trust and trustworthiness in experimental organizations," CEEL Working Papers 1501, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    18. Ilkka Sillanpää, 2012. "Empirical Study of Measuring Supply Chain Performance," MIC 2012: Managing Transformation with Creativity; Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Budapest, 22–24 November 2012 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    19. Rojalin Patri & M. Suresh, 2017. "Modelling the Enablers of Agile Performance in Healthcare Organization: A TISM Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 251-272, September.
    20. Hiroko Nakamura & Shinji Suzuki & Tomobe Hironori & Yuya Kajikawa & Ichiro Sakata, 2011. "Citation lag analysis in supply chain research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(2), pages 221-232, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    AM; GPN; Capabilities; Subnetworks;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:269-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Usman Raja (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/9 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.