IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/anr/refeco/v14y2022p391-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoding Default Risk: A Review of Modeling Approaches, Findings, and Estimation Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Gurdip Bakshi

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA)

  • Xiaohui Gao

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA)

  • Zhaodong Zhong

    (Rutgers Business School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA)

Abstract

Default risk permeates the behavior of corporate bond returns and spreads, credit default swap spreads, estimation of default probabilities, and loss in default. Pertinent to this review are salient empirical findings and implications of default process estimation from 1974 to 2021. Both structural and reduced-form models are covered. In structural models, default occurs if the value of assets falls below some threshold obligation. The reduced-form models involve assumptions about the default process combined with recovery in default. Default process estimation and measurements of default probability have improved by exploiting data on defaultable bonds, credit default swaps, tally of default realizations, and options on individual equities. Empirical investigations continue to address the relevance of stochastic asset volatility, jumps in asset values, and modeling of default boundary and firm leverage process.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurdip Bakshi & Xiaohui Gao & Zhaodong Zhong, 2022. "Decoding Default Risk: A Review of Modeling Approaches, Findings, and Estimation Methods," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 391-413, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:anr:refeco:v:14:y:2022:p:391-413
    DOI: 10.1146/annurev-financial-111720-090709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111720-090709
    Download Restriction: Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1146/annurev-financial-111720-090709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malek Ben-Abdellatif & Hatem Ben-Ameur & Rim Chérif & Bruno Rémillard, 2024. "A two-factor structural model for valuing corporate securities," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 203-225, July.
    2. Jiang Cheng & Hung-Gay Fung & Tzu-Ting Lin & Min-Ming Wen, 2024. "CEO optimism and the use of credit default swaps: evidence from the US life insurance industry," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 169-194, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    default; default intensity-based credit risk models; empirical facts in credit markets; model estimation; recovery in default; structural models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anr:refeco:v:14:y:2022:p:391-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: http://www.annualreviews.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.annualreviews.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.