IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v12y2013i4p595-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Extent to Which an ERP System is Human-Centered Contribute to User Satisfaction with That System?

Author

Listed:
  • Petrus A. USMANIJ
  • Mei-Tai CHU
  • Rajiv KHOSLA

    (La Trobe Business School, Australia)

Abstract

This paper studies direct and indirect impact of the human-centered Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems on user satisfaction. The objective of the paper is to measure a hierarchical influence of five human-centered dimensions on user satisfaction both directly and indirectly. This paper attempts to provide answers to whether the human-centered measurement models provide a systematic evaluation of ERP. The contributions of the paper to knowledge are to establish the need for the human-centered approach as a basis for the design of ERP systems, to define a systematic hierarchical human-centered model for measurement, in particular, and accounting information systems, in general, and to develop methodology for validation of the measurement model and applies it to evaluation of ERP systems. This paper suggests the application of a proposed five dimensional model in measuring the human-centeredness of ERP systems using hierarchical model and looks at the implementation in a university context.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrus A. USMANIJ & Mei-Tai CHU & Rajiv KHOSLA, 2013. "Does the Extent to Which an ERP System is Human-Centered Contribute to User Satisfaction with That System?," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 595-625, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:12:y:2013:i:4:p:595-625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/12_4_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting information systems; enterprise resource planning systems; hierarchical human-centered system; information system success; university context; user satisfaction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:12:y:2013:i:4:p:595-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.