Author
Abstract
Found that the scientific approach to determining the specific objectives in the implementation of the priorities of state policy in the field of taxation, pursued by the state, it implies conformity to the laws of social development. Violation of this essential requirement leads to large losses in the national economy and, ultimately, can lead to destabilization of the economic situation in the country, respectively, and cause deterioration of economic conditions participants of tax relations. Proved that how efficiently carried out tax policy depends on the correctness of tax relations between the subjects of this kind of relationship. An important aspect of the system of tax relations is "legislator", which on the one hand establishes tax laws, on the other - is podatkovozobov'yazanoyu person for these laws. Tax authorities in the person of specialized tax authority responsible for the concrete application of tax laws, that their role is usually limited to the implementation of the fiscal component of tax policy. Tax relations between subjects is based primarily on the legal basis, that is a tax relations. However, besides legal support them there are and methodological support, which should take the leading role of informing, training and consulting taxpayers. Proved that the system of information support workflow processes between government tax and service centers taxpayers must include the implementation of the following measures: modification of existing elements provide information and ensure free communication between client and server Internet portals for the further implementation of e-service "line stage "; formulation and implementation of universal computerized database of answers to the question of economic entities and citizens; centralization of authentication services and coordination of clients with tax authorities using digital signatures for the "paperless" obtain the necessary information.
Suggested Citation
Lytvyn Volodymyr, 2015.
"Using The Tools Of Direct And Indirect Taxes In Government Policy,"
Management, Academy of Municipal Administration, vol. 9(3-4), pages 164-172, October.
Handle:
RePEc:ama:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:3-4:p:164-172
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ama:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:3-4:p:164-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivan Dragan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amakyua.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.