IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v1y2010i12p25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jones, Dechow And Kasznik Models Significance In The Romanian Economic Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru MatiÅŸ
  • Alina Beattrice Vladu
  • Laura Negrea
  • Lucia Sucala

Abstract

This study intends to be a first step into an attempt of measuring the earnings management using an econometric model valid for the Romanian specificities by trying to establish the level of significance of three acknowledged econometric models: Jones (1991), Dechow et al. (1995) and Kasznik (1999) on Romanian economic environment. Given the above mentioned premises, the study was conducted using the Romanian listed companies (active on the Bucharest Stock Exchange) selected by a main criteria: discrepancy between reported cash flow and reported net income. Our analyses lead us to the conclusion related to the above mentioned issues that Jones model was found to be significant for Romanian economic environment in terms of applicability unlike Dechow and Kasznik models, thus it may be further developed and applied to an extended database.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru MatiÅŸ & Alina Beattrice Vladu & Laura Negrea & Lucia Sucala, 2010. "Jones, Dechow And Kasznik Models Significance In The Romanian Economic Environment," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(12), pages 1-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:12:p:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1220101/25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camelia Burja Decemrie, 2011. "Factors Influencing The Companies' Profitability," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(13), pages 1-3.
    2. Daniela Pordea & Dorel Mates, 2019. "DETERMINANTS OF ACCOUNTING CREATIVITY: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROMANIAN SMEs IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(Special), pages 7-18, May.
    3. Botoc Claudiu, 2013. "Profitability - Capital Structure Trade Off: Case Of Publicly Romanian Companies," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 969-975, July.
    4. Jesus Sáenz González & Emma García-Meca, 2014. "Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings Management in Latin American Markets?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 419-440, May.
    5. Susana Callao & José I. Jarne & David Wróblewski, 2019. "A New Perspective on Earnings Management in Emerging European Countries: Investigation on Environmental Factors that Explain Differences in Earnings Management," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 59-81.
    6. Callao, Susana & Jarne, José I. & Wroblewski, David, 2020. "Do the burst of financial crisis and European Union membership impact Earnings Management. Evidence from emerging Eastern European countries," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(4), pages 608-647.
    7. Maria Carmen Huian & Marilena Mironiuc & Mihaela Chiriac, 2018. "Study on the association between earnings management and value relevance based on the reporting method used for operating cash flows," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(149), pages 101-101, February.
    8. Camelia Burja, 2011. "Patrimonial Resources Management And The Economic Performance Of Companies," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(13), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    earnings management; manipulation; cash flow;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:12:p:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.