IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alu/journl/v1y2009i11p7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Web 2.0 Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • DragoÅŸ Marian Mangiuc

Abstract

Any potential investment assumes, from the investor's point of view, answering a legitimate question: “What is the value returned by the current investment?†Investing in the new semantic technologies in the area of Web 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0 are no exception to this rule. The research at hand combines a review of the relevant literature with action research, in order to identify coherent and relevant methods for the measurement of the benefits arising from an investment in the new wave of knowledge management and organizational memory building technologies. The paper is based on the classic ROI computation, attempting to build a new computation model, well suited to measure the success of an implementation of the informational memory. The valuation model (enforced and explained by means of a case study) may be also regarded as a measurement model for the costs and benefits of building organizational memory at the economic entity level.

Suggested Citation

  • DragoÅŸ Marian Mangiuc, 2009. "Measuring Web 2.0 Efficiency," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-7.
    • Handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/1120091/07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational knowledge; ROI; computation model; Web 2.0; Semantic Web;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alu:journl:v:1:y:2009:i:11:p:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan-Constantin Danuletiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.