IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i4p564-573id6029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring what matters: Evaluating the validity and reliability of teachers’ competency scales in China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Zhong
  • Mat Rahimi Bin Yusof

Abstract

This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of teacher competency scales in China, focusing on the Chongqing region. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the study utilizes Hay McBer's teacher-teaching competency model to evaluate three key domains: Value of Teacher Professionalism (VTP), Teaching and Learning Skills (TLS), and Classroom Climate (CC). A sample of 200 teachers was surveyed, and data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through IBM SPSS and SEM AMOS programs. The methodology involved developing and validating a questionnaire based on expert consultations regarding face validity and content reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The findings reveal high reliability and validity across all dimensions, supported by strong expert consensus. EFA indicated that the first three components explained 87.944% of the total variance, with the primary component accounting for 80.552%. CFA confirmed the constructs' validity and reliability, with high loading factors, AVE, and CR values. The model fit indices suggested an adequate fit, with RMSEA within the acceptable range and strong incremental fit indices. This study provides a reliable and valid framework for assessing teacher competency in China, with practical implications for educational policy and teacher training programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Zhong & Mat Rahimi Bin Yusof, 2025. "Measuring what matters: Evaluating the validity and reliability of teachers’ competency scales in China," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(4), pages 564-573.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:564-573:id:6029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/6029/2179
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:564-573:id:6029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.