IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i3p552-567id5254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of intelligent algorithms in systemic financial risk identification: An empirical study of Chinese banking sector

Author

Listed:
  • Ziwei Yu
  • Fei Huang

Abstract

This study investigates how intelligent algorithms enhance systemic financial risk identification in Chinese banking, addressing the gap between technological capabilities and risk management applications. We analyze 36 listed commercial banks from 2018 to 2023 using instrumental variable estimation and difference-in-differences analysis, with comprehensive measures for AI implementation and systemic risk (CoVaR, MES, SRISK). The implementation of intelligent algorithms significantly reduces systemic risk exposure by 18.5%. The primary mechanisms include risk identification efficiency (42.3%), information processing capacity (35.7%), and decision-making optimization (22.0%). Larger banks demonstrate stronger risk-reduction benefits from AI implementation. The research confirms that intelligent algorithms substantially enhance banks' ability to identify and manage systemic risk through multiple operational channels, with effects varying across bank characteristics and market conditions. Regulators should encourage AI adoption for risk management, particularly among smaller institutions, while developing standardized frameworks for evaluating AI-based systems. The heterogeneous effects across bank types suggest the need for tailored technological implementation approaches in risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziwei Yu & Fei Huang, 2025. "The role of intelligent algorithms in systemic financial risk identification: An empirical study of Chinese banking sector," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(3), pages 552-567.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:552-567:id:5254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/5254/1933
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:552-567:id:5254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.