IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v9y2025i3p2038-2048id5745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the business studies curriculum for contemporary business practices

Author

Listed:
  • Simphiwe Mngwengwe
  • Samantha Govender
  • Sello Mokoena

Abstract

The disconnect between theoretical knowledge and practical application in the Business Studies curriculum is a pressing concern, especially in developing nations like South Africa. Rapid changes in business environments and global economic trends necessitate aligning the curriculum with contemporary business practices. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the current Business Studies curriculum in preparing learners for real-world challenges and proposes strategies for improvement. The analysis, based on literature from 1970 to 2024 from publishers like Sage, Taylor & Francis, and Springer, and teachers' perspectives, identified gaps between theory and practice. Key findings reveal that while the curriculum provides a robust theoretical foundation, it lacks practical application, leaving learners ill-prepared for the workforce. Innovative pedagogical strategies, such as project-based learning, experiential activities, and real-world simulations, are essential to bridge this gap. The study emphasizes the importance of cultivating critical thinking, problem-solving, and entrepreneurial skills through tailored teaching methods. Successful implementations of practical learning models in other contexts demonstrate the benefits of integrating such strategies into the curriculum. Recommendations include targeted teacher training programs and fostering partnerships between schools and businesses to provide learners with exposure to authentic business environments, enhancing their readiness for future career challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Simphiwe Mngwengwe & Samantha Govender & Sello Mokoena, 2025. "Evaluating the business studies curriculum for contemporary business practices," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(3), pages 2038-2048.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:2038-2048:id:5745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/5745/2052
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:2038-2048:id:5745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.