Author
Abstract
In heart failure, elevated carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) has been shown to correlate with adverse events. We sought to quantify its prognostic usefulness in predicting the one-month combined death/heart failure readmission endpoint. Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), originally associated with ovarian cancer, has now garnered attention as a potential marker for fluid overload and pulmonary congestion in heart failure patients. However, determining the optimal CA 125 cutoff value for predicting one-month adverse outcomes in heart failure patients remains an area of variability across different research studies. While both biomarkers show promise, further research is needed to determine their comparative utility in predicting adverse outcomes in heart failure patients. Factors such as sensitivity, specificity, and optimal thresholds should be considered. Study objectives: determine the prevalence of in-hospital or one-month mortality and one-month readmission in heart failure patients; determine the cutoff point, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CA 125 in predicting in-hospital or one-month mortality and one-month readmission in heart failure patients. Our cross-sectional study enrolled 121 heart failure patients at the HCMC Hospital of Rehabilitation - Occupational Diseases during the period from September 1, 2023, to July 1, 2024. During the one-month follow-up period, there were 6 cases lost to follow-up, accounting for 6/121=4.95%. The mean age was 69.14 ± 12.96 years, with men comprising 51.2% of the cohort. The median CA 125 value was 29.28 U/mL (interquartile range: 22.57–37.24). There were 2 cases accounting for 1.7% of in-hospital mortality. There were 8 cases, accounting for 6.6%, who died one month after discharge from the hospital. There were 30 cases, accounting for 24.8%, of re-hospitalization within one month of discharge. The optimal CA 125 cutoff for predicting in-hospital mortality was > 91.6 U/mL, yielding an AUC ROC of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.812–0.937, p < 0.0001), sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 85.8%. The optimal CA 125 cutoff for predicting one-month mortality was > 29.6 U/mL, yielding an AUC ROC of 0.667 (95% CI: 0.573–0.752, p = 0.120), sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 53.3%. The optimal CA 125 cutoff for predicting one-month rehospitalization was ≤44.3 U/mL, yielding an AUC ROC of 0.508 (95% CI: 0.413–0.602, p = 0.889), sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 35.3%. The optimal CA 125 cutoff for predicting the one-month combined endpoint of death/rehospitalization was > 26.05 U/mL, yielding an AUC ROC of 0.534 (95% CI: 0.438–0.627, p = 0.543), sensitivity of 66.67%, and specificity of 51.32%. CA 125 demonstrates good accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality with a cutoff of > 91.6 U/mL, an AUC ROC of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.812–0.937, p < 0.0001), sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 85.8%.
Suggested Citation
Phan Thai Hao, 2025.
"The value of CA125 in predicting adverse outcomes in heart failure patients,"
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 9(3), pages 1997-2007.
Handle:
RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:1997-2007:id:5731
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:1997-2007:id:5731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.